AI Feedback

Formative feedback for every

student

Eduface generates personalised, rubric-aligned feedback on every submission drafted by AI, reviewed by you, delivered through the tools students already use.

Use Eduface for free

Try out with

Free to start · No card required · GDPR compliant

How it works

You configure it once,
Eduface delivers the feedback.

Formative feedback can reach students without passing through your inbox.

Feedback delivery

Student submits

Eduface generates feedback

Student receives it instantly

Lecturer can see the shared feedback and make edits

Course-specific knowledge assessment

Referencing conventions

Grammar and spelling

Ready to save hours on feedback?

Free to start · No card required · GDPR compliant

Create free account

Google

Ready to save hours on feedback?

Free to start · No card required · GDPR compliant

Create free account

Google

Beyond rubric scoring

Calibrated to your course and criteria.

Eduface is configured with the academic standards, subject knowledge, and expected level of understanding for each specific course, based on your input. Every piece of feedback reflects where the student is in their program.

Academic writing style

APA · MLA · Harvard · Institution-specific

The model checks referencing conventions against the exact format configured for your course. In-text citations, reference lists, and formatting are assessed against your faculty's required standard, whether APA 7th, MLA 9th, Harvard, or a bespoke institutional style

Grammar and spelling

Language errors · Academic register · Clarity

Course-specific content

Subject knowledge · Learning outcomes · Module depth

app.eduface.io/reader/batch-12

Reflective Practice — Module 4

According to Smith (2021) thefindings suggest a clear relationshipbetween formative feedbackfrequency and student achievementgains.

This week's session extended the theoretical frameworks introduced in the previous two lectures, applying them to the practical context observed during the placement period.

The evidence gathered broadly aligns with current literature, though several tensions emerged that warrant further consideration in this reflective account.

AI Feedback

"According to Smith (2021) the findings suggest a clear relationship between form…"

In-text citation format doesn't match APA 7th edition, a comma is required between author and year: (Smith, 2021). Also check that the reference list entry includes the DOI or URL as required by your institutional guidelines.

Academic writing style

APA · MLA · Harvard · Institution-specific

Grammar and spelling

Language errors · Academic register · Clarity

Course-specific content

Subject knowledge · Learning outcomes · Module depth

app.eduface.io/reader/batch-12

Reflective Practice — Module 4

According to Smith (2021) thefindings suggest a clear relationshipbetween formative feedbackfrequency and student achievementgains.

This week's session extended the theoretical frameworks introduced in the previous two lectures, applying them to the practical context observed during the placement period.

The evidence gathered broadly aligns with current literature, though several tensions emerged that warrant further consideration in this reflective account.

AI Feedback

"According to Smith (2021) the findings suggest a clear relationship between form…"

Built for your discipline

Six submodels
Each trained as a domain expert

Eduface is trained to give the best feedback to your students. That is why create domain experts in our model.

⚖️

Law

📈

Economics

🔬

Social Sciences

⚙️

STEM

📖

Humanities

🩺

Health Sciences

Active submodel

Law

The Law submodel understands legal argumentation structure, case law citation conventions, statutory interpretation methods, and the difference between a well- constructed argument and one that merely sounds convincing.

APA, OSCOLA, and Bluebook citation formats

IRAC and CREAC argumentation structure

Statutory interpretation and case law hierarchy

International law and local law frameworks

Example feedback

"Under Art. 7:653 DCC, a non-compete clause must be agreed in writing and must not disproportionately harm the employee's career prospects..."

Your application of Art. 7:653 is correct, but the argument lacks a proportionality analysis. To reach a higher mark, you need to explicitly weigh the employer's business interest against the restriction on the employee using the Hof Amsterdam standard.

⚖️

Law

📈

Economics

🔬

Social Sciences

⚙️

STEM

📖

Humanities

🩺

Health Sciences

Active submodel

Law

APA, OSCOLA, and Bluebook citation formats

IRAC and CREAC argumentation structure

Statutory interpretation and case law hierarchy

International law and local law frameworks

Example feedback

"Under Art. 7:653 DCC, a non-compete clause must be agreed in writing and must not disproportionately harm the employee's career prospects..."

Feedback style

Choose the tone of feedback

Multiple feedback styles available at the click of a button, additionally you can train the AI to give feedback in your style. Each style configurable per assignment to deliver the feedback you want.

Reflective & Socratic

Nudges deeper thinking

→

Constructive & Direct

Clear, actionable steps

Went Well & Needs Improvement

Structured dual format

↑

Supportive & Encouraging

Motivates progression

Reflective & Socratic

Curious, questioning and coaching. Designed for lecturers who want students to arrive at their own insights rather than be told what to fix.

Assignment

Globalisation and inequality — Week 3, Economics

Feedback generated

Your argument in paragraph 3 makes an interesting claim about the relationship between trade liberalisation and wage stagnation. What evidence would a critic use to challenge this position? How might acknowledging that counter-argument actually strengthen your overall thesis rather than weaken it?

Reflective & Socratic

Nudges deeper thinking

→

Constructive & Direct

Clear, actionable steps

Went Well & Needs Improvement

Structured dual format

↑

Supportive & Encouraging

Motivates progression

Reflective & Socratic

Curious, questioning and coaching. Designed for lecturers who want students to arrive at their own insights rather than be told what to fix.

Assignment

Globalisation and inequality — Week 3, Economics

Feedback generated

Skill progression

Eduface tracks the students' skills for you

Eduface tracks the skills you define. Draft by draft, student by student.

Active course

Economics 201

Week 6 · Student s2819047

Skills defined by lecturer

You choose which skills to track per assignment

Application of economic models

D1 →

/100

+40

pts

Final

Empirical data interpretation

D1 →

/100

+41

pts

Final

Policy evaluation

D1 →

/100

+30

pts

Final

See your own students' progression and start giving AI feedback in minutes

Join 5,000+ lecturers

Ready to give every student
better feedback?

Join institutions across the UK, Ireland and the Netherlands
saving hundreds of hours every semester.

Book a demo

Free to start · No credit card required · GDPR compliant

Join 5,000+ lecturers

Ready to give every student
better feedback?

Join institutions across the UK, Ireland and the Netherlands
saving hundreds of hours every semester.

Book a demo

Free to start · No credit card required · GDPR compliant

Formative feedback for every

student

You configure it once,Eduface delivers the feedback.

Calibrated to your course and criteria.

Six submodelsEach trained as a domain expert

Choose the tone of feedback

Eduface tracks the students' skills for you

Ready to give every studentbetter feedback?

Ready to give every studentbetter feedback?

You configure it once,
Eduface delivers the feedback.

Six submodels
Each trained as a domain expert

Ready to give every student
better feedback?

Ready to give every student
better feedback?